You can not even delete clips on the timeline by hitting the delete key. I found OpenShot rather difficult to use, as it even lacks basic functionality. When I last tried OpenShot, unexpected things was happening, and I think the reason is the program is either less mature, or simply less intuitive to use. While there are other editors, such as OpenShot, I personally prefer Kdenlive. Not necessarily because it would be impossible to make them in Kdenlive. The way I am doing this, is by pre-rendering some of my reusable video clips in Windows and later loading them into my Kdenlive projects. In spite of it's limits, Kdenlive is still very easy to use.įor the first time I am actually able to do much of my editing in Linux, saving time by not having to reboot into Windows. I would personally prefer fade from alpha, which would allow the track below the clip to be visible as intuitively expected.Ĭurrently, creating an alpha fade involves using keyframes on the opacity of the clip, which is just a rather clumsy way of doing it. By default a fade from black will be used when grabbing the corners of clips. Using Kdenlive is also not as straight forward as I would like, but I still think Kdenlive does things better than OpenShot. It makes sense if you think about it, because who can compete with free? Editing in Kdenlive Often commercial editors will not be able to compete with tools such as handbrake, and chances are that this will also happen with other free software. If we want to convert video it is actually the other way around. The simple ability to easily cut video clips, add dissolves, and fade effects was exactly what I was looking for. I personally found Kdenlive very intuitive to use. ![]() Video editing is still not very smooth in Linux, but with editors such as Kdenlive and OpenSHot, I think we are starting to see some progress.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |